“How do you decide which horror to notice?” This question,
rhetorically muttered by the embittered old painter who is the
central character of *Ten Unknowns*, could double as the
artistic credo of the play’s author. In the seven plays
he’s written in 15 years, Jon Robin Baitz has focused on
corruption and moral rot as it shows up in various corners of
business -- publishing, academia, high finance, Hollywood.
Here he takes on the art
world. Malcolm Raphelson (blandly played by Donald Sutherland)
is an obscure figurative painter who felt shut out when
Abstract Expressionism hit the art world and fled to rural
Mexico for an extended period of heavy drinking and not
painting. Hoping to launch a lucrative rediscovery campaign,
his ambitious dealer Trevor Fabricant (a superbly irritating
performance by Denis O’Hare) has arranged a 50-year
retrospective at a New York gallery. To pull some new work out
of the old guy, Trevor has dispatched his ex-lover Judd
Sturgess (the mesmerizing Justin Kirk), an aspiring painter
and part-time junkie, to work as his assistant. The
matchmaking seems to have worked. A number of striking new
paintings have appeared, and Trevor, who has already sold them
sight unseen, has come to collect them. The problem, we learn
as the first act closes, is that Malcolm is too rusty and
terrified to touch brush to canvas, and the images have been
executed by Justin.
If Baitz had stopped there,
he would have created an evocative one-act play with three
sharply drawn characters, leaving the audience pondering the
mysteries of collaboration, blocked creativity, and male
mentorship. Unfortunately, the second act goes on to
overexplain everything the audience has already gleaned,
turning the characters into one-note types: the hypocritical
failed artist, the greedy art dealer, the self-destructive
fag. A fourth character, a Berkeley graduate student
researching a nearly-extinct species of frog, is around to
provide some anemic heterosexual love interest. Played
somnolently by Julianna Margulies, she spouts cringe-worthy
lines like “I don’t understand how you artists live with
all this feeling.” Worst of all, the play spends an
inordinate amount of time making the kind of philistine
pronouncements about abstract and conceptual art that have
always been made by people who know nothing about art. Such
cheap shots and corny pseudo-conflicts are unworthy of a
writer with Baitz’s fierce intelligence.
The Advocate, April 24, 2001
|